Dashboard Design · Data Visualization · Finance · Internal Tools

fund dashboard

Project

Designed an internal dashboard that brings fund information into one place, from a quick overview to detailed performance metrics.

Users

Regional Consultants who sell funds to financial analysts, and Product Strategists who compare and position them.

Challenge

Fund information was scattered across applications, the corporate website, and other departments.

Goal

The data stays the same. The presentation follows the question.

Two views of the same fund dashboard side by side. On the left, Standardized Performance is a compact table; on the right, it expands into an interactive performance chart. Both sit above the same Rankings, Breakdown, and Holdings sections.

One dashboard structure, two ways to show the same performance data.

Same data, different questions

One dashboard, two ways to read performance

Two groups needed the same fund data for very different reasons. A Regional Consultant is usually on a call and needs a number now. A Product Strategist is trying to understand why a fund is ahead of or behind its benchmarks.

Regional Consultant

“While on a call, I need to find the fund’s current price, expense ratio, yield, etc…”

Product Strategist

“I need to find where and why this product is doing best/worst compared to our benchmarks.”

Rather than build two dashboards, I kept one structure and changed how the Standardized Performance data is presented.

For Regional Consultants, it stays a compact table that’s fast to scan mid-conversation. For Product Strategists, it expands into an interactive chart with quartile ranking bands, built for comparing a fund against its category and benchmark over time.

Regional Consultant dashboard view with Standardized Performance shown as a compact table of YTD, 1YR, 3YR, 5YR, and 10YR returns and rankings
Regional Consultant: a table to scan on a call.
Product Strategist dashboard view with Standardized Performance expanded into an interactive chart showing floating bars and quartile ranking bands across time periods
Product Strategist: a chart to compare against the benchmark.
Research

Testing the hierarchy before the screens

I started from component wireframes based on the business requirements. Before designing any screens, we tested what belonged on the dashboard and in what order, using paper prototypes and card sorting sessions with both user groups.

Once the hierarchy held up, we moved to Axure and InVision prototypes for early user testing, and only then designed the framework.

Three photos from the process: sticky notes and index cards spread across a desk during a card sorting session, a stack of printed wireframe cards next to Snapshot Performance Returns and Equity Attribution mockups, and a hand holding a tablet showing an early fund dashboard prototype
Card sorting, printed component wireframes, and a tablet prototype.
Trend vs. ranking

Two charts for two kinds of question

The detailed views answer different questions, so they behave differently. One shows how a fund’s price has moved over time. The other shows how its returns rank against competitors.

Historical price

Most people check this chart for what happened recently, so the y-axis sits on the right, next to the latest data. The range goes from one month back to the fund’s inception, at daily or monthly granularity.

There are three ways to set the timeframe: preset buttons (1M, 3M, YTD, and so on), the range navigator, or start and end dates. All three stay in sync. Each device gets the controls that suit it: the navigator on desktop, and tapping, dragging, or pinch-to-zoom on tablet.

NAV Historical chart with right-axis layout, daily granularity, date range fields, time-period buttons (1M, 3M, YTD, 1Y, 3Y, 5Y, ALL), and a range navigator at the bottom
Historical price: presets, navigator, and dates all set the same range.

Standardized performance

Floating stacked bars show the spread of returns in each ranking quartile, so a Product Strategist can see whether a fund’s rank reflects a real difference in returns.

Over one day, the quartiles barely differ. Over three years, they spread wide. Showing the spread makes it clear which rankings actually mean something. Hovering or tapping a period shows its returns and quartile ranges.

Standardized Performance chart with floating stacked bars representing quartile rankings across 1 Day through 10-YR periods, plus a detail panel for the selected period
Standardized performance: the quartile spread widens over longer periods.